Quote from article on centralised computing

Just been browsing a Facebook group called ‘Correct Spelling, Punctuation and Apostrophe Use’. It was recommended by Kenny, a magazine editor who’s pretty hot on all those things. The group itself, though, seems to be populated largely by the kind of language maven satirised by Steven Pinker: people who aren’t really interested in language, but have picked up bits of Fowler or Strunk, or just some prejudices from their parents or teachers, and get some kind of satisfaction from chucking these in the general direction of the cesspit of lazy non-standard usage that is everyday communication.

For example:

Has anyone ever gone “acrossed” the street or known someone who did?

I haven’t, but speakers of one of the many dialects in which this is a standard pronunciation of ‘across’ may well have done so. And what of it?

I am today reminded of the dickheads that use “aks” instead of “ask”.

Yes, all those Afro-Caribbean dickheads – I got nuffink against em but they don’t talk proper innit.

How about “anyways”? (I’m going over there anyways.) Like fingernails on a blackboard for me.

Quick, run back to your village where everyone talks the same as you!

Has anyone yet mentioned the ghastly errors with ‘alternate’ and ‘alternative’? The former is now used so often that we are in danger of it being accepted as correct usage.

Things are even worse in the States, where that usage has even infected the dictionaries. Where will it end?

People who say “pitcher” when talking about “pictures.” I want to rip out their vocal cords!

Surely you mean vochal cords. Are you pronouncing that “pick-cher”, or to be strictly correct should we say “pickt-your”? Oh, and, just checking: who died and made you Queen?

My personal pet peeve is the use of the word “healthy” for the word “healthful.” Let’s remember to start the day with a healthful breakfast and end the day with a healthful snack. (I know I’m on the losing end of this one.)

WTF???!!!! (Sorry about the punctuation.) You can’t cope with a transferred epithet, so you invent a brand new ugly word that fails to express what a perfectly good word was already conveying to everyone else? What are you, Percy Grainger?

One that bugs me is … “I could care less” when correctly it should be … “I couldn’t care less!”

As Pinker has pointed out, this usage is derived from a phenomenon known to linguists as ‘sarcasm’. Me, I’m bugged by people who misuse ellipsis and put punctuation inside speech marks that belongs to the framing statement.

With all the money that WalMart has, you’d think they would hire someone to edit their signs prior to printing…

Or just before.

‘funner’ isn’t bad grammar - I believe it’s bad syntax -but I’m prepared to be corrected.

I think you think it’s bad morphology, but really it’s a deliberate neologism. Apple weren’t* committing an error when they advertised ‘the funnest iPod ever’, just as they weren’t when they asked us to ‘Think Different’. It’s OK to play with language. Go on, you won’t break it.

*Singular noun, plural meaning. Take your pick as long as you keep it consistent.

so many people don’t understand why it is wrong to say “different than”.

Yes, it’s one of the major problems facing our society. So, um, remind us – why is it wrong?

I thought I wanted to be part of this group, but not when you mock people’s dialects.

A voice of reason! Swiftly squished by:

I highly doubt those that say “ax” don’t know it is spelled “ask”.

OMFG – we’ve all been agonising about this pronunciation stuff when all we needed to do was say everything just like it’s written!

In among the crap, though, are some genuine infelicities. I particularly liked

“So many options on our menu; each one better than the next”

Better order quickly.

Leave a comment on this post

Puh? Meh

Blogged on 1 July 2009

Ricoh, best known for the kind of office machines bought by people who still call things ‘office machines’, has launched a cloud archive service called quanp. It’s not clear what’s good about the product except that it can show you your files in a sort of 3D landscape reminiscent of ‘virtual reality’ database visualisations in crappy films. Oh, wait, that’s not good. Although if you like wet floor effects you’ll like it a lot.

What’s bad about it is ‘quanp’. What the hell? I almost feel bad for satirising Pantone’s Goe. At least you could attempt to pronounce that. Apparently quanp is

short for ‘quantum paper’ and pronounced ‘kwan-puh’

No it isn’t. It’s pronounced ‘kwonp’. Any fool can see that. Or maybe ‘kwaaahhnp’ if you’re Snake from The Simpsons. Not ‘kwan-puh’. Definitely not going to happen.

And what’s with the website? Having decided to rip off www.apple.com, could they have got it any wronger? The best bit is where they’ve rendered the main copy as a jpeg because live text wasn’t going to be beautiful enough… and then typeset it so horribly that Verdana would have looked better. Ick.

Read 1 comment on this post, or add your own

Era error

Blogged on 30 June 2009

Alexander Armstrong and Martin Freeman are to star in a new BBC4 factual-based comedy drama about the rise and fall of the home computer market in the 1980s [...] ‘Syntax Era’ [...] is described as an ‘affectionately comic account’ of the race for home computer supremacy, with Sinclair’s ZX Spectrum and C5 battling Curry’s BBC Micro.

The trouble about making TV for geeks is that geeks insist on you getting stuff right. When the heck did the Speccie compete with the BBC Micro? They were in completely different price brackets, for a start. The main rival to Sinclair was Commodore. You can’t turn a multi-vendor market into a duel just because the BBC and Sir Clive were both British. And why is the main Beeb character Curry, not Hauser? Did he not fit the Brit thing? (Cue endless Curry-Hauser/Jobs-Woz/marketing-product debate.)

I’m looking forward to this, though. The casting is good (Armstrong and Freeman are both annoying and overrated, lol). And – there’s a BBC4! Who knew?

Leave a comment on this post

So Jammie Thomas-Rasset, who appealed after being told to pay $220,000 for illegally sharing a couple of dozen music tracks via P2P, now faces an increased award of $1.92 million.

Both Thomas-Rasset and the twelve idiots jury members are bystanders in a war between the entertainment industry and reality. History will recognise them as blameless. Others will not be so fortunate. The RIAA was a nuisance when it hindered progress towards legal online music sales and struck out blindly at any business or service that could conceivably facilitate unlicensed sharing, but now that it’s attacking the general public it needs to be put down.

More culpable still are the courts handing down these judgements. ‘But it’s the law’ is a Nuremberg defence. In the face of such onslaughts against ordinary citizens, lawyers worthy of the name need to consider the kind of action taken by their counterparts in less mature democracies: resignations, walk-outs, refusals to cooperate or to recognise the court. To say, ‘Well, ma’am, all you did was share a few songs, and you’ve given evidence that you didn’t even know how it worked, but the law says you have to pay the man, and these twelve idiots good people and true have worked out the bill at two million bucks, so you and your kids are poor now’ is the action of a lackey, not a judge.

The EFF’s estimable Fred von Lohmann finds two grounds on which Thomas-Rasset might appeal. He’s pissing in the wind. This is now an issue of human rights, not legal technicalities. Those within the justice system who have the decency to see how wrong all this has become will only make a big enough difference fast enough if they abandon argument in favour of resistance.

And those who don’t, including anyone acting for the RIAA or other plaintiffs in personal filesharing cases, must ask themselves whether they can claim any longer to be playing a part in a legitimate system, or are simply doing wrong. The law in this area is inadequate and inappropriate to its task; to continue to uphold and exploit it is morally indefensible. This bandwagon must be stopped.

Leave a comment on this post

Part manifesto and part textbook, Designing Sustainable Packaging provides just what you want from a guide to a creative field: a sound overview of the subject in its contemporary context, followed by practical tutorials and examples. Scott Boylston is a college professor in Savannah, Georgia, but the book’s American slant is offset by British spelling and appearances from limeys like Innocent. continue reading at www.macuser.co.uk

Leave a comment on this post

Guides and grids are critical to the layout process. Just as important as vertical column guides is a horizontal baseline grid. ‘Baseline’ refers to the imaginary line on which text characters sit. Lay a ruler on top of any newspaper, and you’ll find the lines of text in each column line up all the way across. Special elements such as boxouts and pullquotes may be excepted, but in general higgledy-piggledy baselines look poor.

Read the full article in MacUser Vol 25 No 13, on sale now.

Leave a comment on this post

Cat failing to pull string

New research suggests (has your heart begun to sink at those words?) that cats are less – or, as the researcher politically correctly has it, differently – intelligent than previously suspected.

Britta Osthaus* tested 15 cats on their ability to retrieve food from under a transparent screen by pulling strings. Apparently dogs can see which of two strings to pull, but cats are just as likely to pull the wrong one. Neither can cope with crossed strings.

‘This finding is somehow surprising,’ says Osthaus, with a rather charming misuse of ‘somehow’ that reminds me of my German teacher, ‘as cats regularly use their paws and claws to pull things towards them during play and hunting.’ Yes, and how often in evolutionary history are those things likely to have been on the end of crossed strings? If anything it seems more surprising that dogs can do it, but either way, BFD. Where are the Shepard & Metzler-style Big Implications?

The small number of subjects is frustrating too. Are cats rare in Canterbury? With the crossed strings, 14 cats performed in line with chance, while one picked the wrong string every time. That’s a pretty big difference. Was this Supercat? (Or Superdumbcat, depending on how you look at it.) Are there more cats like this? And what kind of dogs were they? Since almost every contemporary breed of dog has been artificially developed to fulfil a specific human purpose, such as fetching game or winning dog shows, can we learn much about anything (except dog breeding) from what they can and can’t do compared to other animals?

Hmm. Anyway, the story is notable for a quality example of a painfully strained real-world application. ‘If we know [cats’] limits we won’t expect too much of them, which in turn is important for their welfare.’ Yeah, I realise now that it’s pointless whipping the cats on my cat farm when they fail to meet their string-pulling targets – I’ll hire some dogs and put those cats back on the packaging line. Good luck with the grant, Britta.

*Who does have a doctorate but must have omitted it in her press release, since the Guardian doesn’t mention it and the Telegraph refers to her quaintly as ‘Mrs’ back

Leave a comment on this post

So the Sunday Times is the latest paper thinking seriously about charging for its online edition. I’m sceptical about paid online content – most people seem to feel the natural order of things is that print costs money and online doesn’t, and changing the way people feel about the natural order of things is an uphill struggle at the best of times – but it’s tempting to think there might be an opportunity if all the major news providers jump at the same time, right now, before quality follows revenues down to a point where nobody will stump up cash for it in any medium.

The Wall Street Journal is often cited as the standard bearer of newspaper pay sites, but I don’t think it’s a great example. (Jeff Jarvis just cancelled, for a start.) The WSJ is essentially a niche B2B product, and was charging a hefty fee; whether that’ll work or not has little relevance to mass market daily papers going paid-for. Though it runs lots of analysis, as opposed to less distinctive fast news, its partisan and somewhat archaic world view is bound to limit its potential audience. Outside its target audience of conservative American money men, it can be all but unintelligible.

In some ways, the Sunday Times is an ideal candidate for mainstream paid content. It doesn’t contain much news that would be easy to find free elsewhere, so readers might be prepared to stump up to keep reading it. But it’s a highly tactile product, legendarily huge and traditionally enjoyed over a lazy morning with coffee and croissants. The web will never replicate that experience, and I doubt Kindle and its ilk can either. The Sunday Times proposition as we know it is unique to print.

The Guardian’s owners say they have no plans to charge, but could they? It has, I think, the best newspaper website in the world, and I’d miss it enough to pay for it. But many of its readers would resent losing free access precisely because it’s a product that feels more like an essential than a luxury; and they’d have a stick with which to beat the owners in the shape of the public service ethos laid down by the Scott Trust. At best, the price would have to be set very carefully to avoid a revolt.

More importantly, having one of the UK’s most popular websites has undoubtedly broadened the Guardian’s audience and influence. Put it behind a fence and that effect is immediately lost.

For that reason if no other, I think free content funded by advertising still looks like the best model for serious journalism. Whether it’s one that can be sustained is another question.

Leave a comment on this post

Bring back hanging

In print on 5 June 2009

Hanging punctuation example

© Adam Banks licensed to Dennis Publishing Ltd

No, it’s not a policy announcement from UKIP, it’s a tutorial on the new hanging punctuation options in QuarkXPress 8. In MacUser Vol 25 No 12, on sale now.

Leave a comment on this post

PDFs for non-dummies

In print on 5 June 2009

Adobe PDF is a superbly flexible file format that’s become the norm for sharing documents. It’s also increasingly dominant as a way of delivering desktop publishing (DTP) jobs to print shops, but the plethora of output options has many users questioning whether it really makes things easier.

In this article we’ll explain all the basics of PDF for prepress. We’ll focus on output from the leading DTP applications, InDesign and QuarkXPress; graphics programs such as Photoshop, Illustrator and Corel Painter also have PDF export facilities, and similar issues apply.

Where to begin

There are essentially three ways to produce a PDF. The simplest is to use the PDF generator built into Mac OS X, which is accessible from almost every application via the Print dialog box. In a drop-down menu at the bottom left corner is an option to Save as PDF. This does exactly what it says on the tin, but you’ll notice a suspicious lack of options. If you need a quick copy of something in a format that both you and any other user can easily open and will look roughly as intended, it’s very handy. As a way of storing complex documents ready for reliable and accurate reproduction, however, it’s about as effective as taking a picture of the screen with your iPhone.

Read the full article in MacUser Vol 25 No 12, on sale now.

Leave a comment on this post